Skip to main content

3 Secrets for Smarter Teams: #1, Add More Women

It takes more than smart people to make smart teams.

It has been a good week to discover "best practices" for smart and successful teams, at least in the press. This weekend I read no fewer than six separate, yet related, pieces on this topic. Unsurprising, as each article and blog entry catalyzes others in our omni-connected world.
Here's the theme:
“Groups of smart people can make horrible decisions — or great ones. Psychologists have known for a century that individuals vary in their cognitive ability. But are some groups, like some people, reliably smarter than others?”
In a nutshell the answer is "yes." Groups with specific characteristics consistently behave "smarter" than others - “collective” or “group” intelligence and team productivity are distinguished by 3 shared attributes:
  1. Productive teams have members who contribute equally to discussions. No one should dominate, or monopolize, the group discussions. See, “Pulpit Bullies: Why Dominating Leaders Kill Teams” from the Harvard Business Review. 
  2. Productive teams have members who effectively read the complex emotions of others. Testing of this ability includes “Reading the Mind in the Eyes,” whereby one reads subject's emotions by simply looking at photographs of their eyes. You can take this test yourself, right here. Smart teams go beyond the ability to read facial expressions and achieve a more general skill, known as “Theory of Mind,” to keep track of what other people feel, know and believe.
  3. Finally, “teams with more women outperformed teams with more men.”According to the MIT study, the effectiveness of having more women on a team may derive from “the fact that women, on average, were better at “mind-reading” than men.”
The "Avengers" would perform better with more women on their team
For productivity, fill your team with humble, empathetic professional women.
Further, the studies illustrate that "social sensitivity" is a skill not a personality trait. And, significant in our world of growing physical disconnection, the research indicates that these empathy skills are valuable to group success both on- and offline. 
The source of these stories stems from clinical research published in the journals “Science” and PLOS One based upon research conducted at The Center for Collective Intelligence at MIT.
One well-written article on this subject is from the researchers themselves (Anita Wooley, Thomas W. Malone and Christopher Chabris) as it appears in The New York Times “Why Some Teams Are Smarter Than Others.”
On LinkedIn, you can read more on this topic from Cass Sunstein and Reid Hastie; they use sports metaphors (think Michael Jordan and Magic Johnson) and excerpts from Sunstein’s new book to produce the derivative post, “Forget Myers-Briggs: To Build a Great Team, Focus on 'Factor C’."
And, you can read about How to Look Smarter.
© David J. Katz, New York City.

Popular posts from this blog

Taking Tips From a Younger Generation

Phyllis Korkki, an assignment editor at The New York Times, visited the garment district in Manhattan to interview designers as part of a story for the newspaper’s Snapchat account. Credit George Etheredge/The New York Times
What Could I Possibly Learn From A Mentor Half My Age? Plenty.

How on earth did I become an “older worker?”

It was only a few years ago, it seems, that I set out to climb the ladder in my chosen field. That field happens to be journalism, but it shares many attributes with countless other workplaces. For instance, back when I was one of the youngest people in the room, I was helped by experienced elders who taught me the ropes.

Now, shockingly, I’m one of the elders. And I’ve watched my industry undergo significant change. That’s why I recently went searching for a young mentor — yes, a younger colleague to mentor me.

Discounts, Discovery & Delight: 3Ds for Retail Success

In fashion and retail, Dopamine is the drug of choice. Technically, Dopamine is the neurotransmitter of “desire.” Dopamine leaps across synapses in our brain to control our reward and pleasure centers. It enables craving. It induces repeat behaviors. It makes us want more. Therefore, it is in our best interest to create products and experiences which induce the release of dopamine in our consumers. We could use some dopamine for ourselves, too. In our fashion and retail world, there are three primary stimuli, "3Ds," we can control to deliver hits of dopamine: Discounts, Discovery and Delight.

Beware of Wombats & Other Vampires

You are surrounded by dangerous WOMBATS. They’re everywhere. Sometimes they hide in plain sight, easy to spot. Other times they are well camouflaged, requiring heightened awareness to identify them. You need to stay alert, it’s important to avoid them. WOMBATs resemble ordinary, productive tasks. However, they are vampires for time and resources, weapons of mass distraction.WOMBATs are seductive. Working on a WOMBAT feels productive.WOMBATs are bad for your career.WOMBATs are bad for your business.WOMBATs infiltrate your work day (and your personal time). Strike them down.WOMBATs may be be ingrained in your company culture: “We’ve always done it that way…” WOMBAT Metamorphosis Alert: A task or project that wasproductive in the pastcanevolve into a WOMBAT in today's environment.Your comfort zone is populated with WOMBATs.More on comfort zones, here.Some people are WOMBATs in disguise. Stay away from them, they are vampire WOMBATs.If you don’t control your WOMBATs, your WOMBATs will…